<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>The Gantry Launchpad</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2011:/blog/1</id>
   <updated>2011-08-04T05:19:28Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Devoted to space, science, politics, the arts, and humor</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Why I&apos;m not happy with the new Red Tails trailer.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2011/08/why_im_not_happy_with_the_new.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2011:/blog//1.295</id>
   
   <published>2011-08-04T03:34:16Z</published>
   <updated>2011-08-04T05:19:28Z</updated>
   
   <summary>This began as a comment at Lex&apos;s place, but ... grew... So I moved it here. :) I downloaded the hi-def version of the trailer, and it&apos;s 864x368. I can&apos;t say how much that affected the look of the CGI,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Arts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Military" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[This began as a comment at <a href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2011/08/02/red-meat/">Lex's place</a>, but ... grew... So I moved it here. :)

I downloaded the hi-def version of the trailer, and it's 864x368. I can't say how much that affected the look of the CGI, but Lucas loves him some digital, so I expect the full version to be pretty good. It might even persuade me to buy a Blue-Ray player. :)

The Fortresses seemed to blow up pretty easily...

The Wiki article on the film includes this: <blockquote>1944. World War II rages and the <i>fate of the free world hangs in the balance</i>.

[snip]

As the war in Europe continues to take its dire toll on Allied forces, Pentagon brass has no recourse but to reconsider these under-utilized pilots for combat duty. Just as the young Tuskegee men are on the brink of being shut down and shipped back home, Col. A.J. Bullard (Terrence Howard) awards them the ultimate chance to prove their mettle high above. Undaunted by the prospect of providing safe escort to bombers in broad daylight -- a mission so dangerous that the <i>RAF has refused it and the white fighter groups have sustained substantial losses</i> -- Easy's pilots at last join the fiery aerial fray
</blockquote> (my emphasis)

If you watch the trailer carefully, you will catch comments to the effect that the white escort pilots were too busy hunting scalps to defend the bombers.

I know Lucas is historically ignorant (he considers the battle on Endor his metaphor for the Vietnam War) but that's just pathetic. 

]]>
      <![CDATA[In the real world, Eighth Bomber command in northern Europe (not the Fifteenth in North Africa/Italy) suffered crippling losses, but that was during the second half of 1943, not 1944, with the raid on Schweinfurt as the leading example. The change came during "Big Week" (Project ARGUMENT) in late February, 1944. From Martin Caidin's <i>Flying Forts!</i>:<blockquote>A study of the Big Week produced impressive and satisfying figures. Most of these have been derived from .German as well as American sources. First, the Eighth on these five missions sent up more than 3,300 bombers, and the Fifteenth put up another 500.

The 3,800 bombers that hit their main targets dropped a tonnage roughly equal to the total bomb tonnage dropped by the Eighth Air Force in its entire first year of operations—approximately 10,000 tons of bombs. Planners had expected losses to be very heavy; they were considerably less than anticipated. The Eighth lost 137 bombers and the Fifteenth another eighty-nine, producing an overall loss ratio of about six percent of the strike armadas. Fighters from the Eighth, Ninth and Fifteenth Air Force flew, respectively, 2,548,712 and 413 escort missions. Twenty-eight fighters were shot down. Approximately 2,600 men were lost—taking into account killed, missing and seriously wounded.

[snip]

There is reason to believe that the large and fiercely fought air battles of those six February days had more effect in establishing the air superiority on which Allied plans so largely depended than did the bombing of industrial plants. Total USSTAF claims of enemy aircraft destroyed amounted to well above 600, with more than a third of these victories credited to the fighter escort and roughly another third to the bombers of the Fifteenth Air Force, <i>which enjoyed no long-range escort</i>.

[snip]

When Mission 115 ended late in the day of 14th October 1943, few leaders of the Eighth Air Force doubted but that the Germans had seized a firm grip on air superiority over the Reich. When the Big Week ended late in February 1944, it was becoming just as evident that the Germans had lost what they struggled so tenaciously to attain. That became evident when the Luftwaffe switched its old tactics and adopted a new plan that had caution stamped all over it. The Germans could, when they made the effort, put up an intense and effective defense. They could batter a bombing force with deadly results. But they could not do so, not any longer, whenever they so wanted. They could not do so as a matter of policy.</blockquote> (again, my emphasis) 

In other words, the war was <i>not</i> in the balance, and by spring 1944 the advantage lay heavily weighted for the Allies.

Lucasfilm was correct in that the Brits refused daylight escort, but only because they considered daylight bombing in general suicidally foolish, hence their reluctance is irrelevant to the history of the Tuskegee Airmen. Their doctrine was devoted to night bombing & escort. As for continued "substantial losses" for white escort pilots, I have never seen any reports which substantiate this claim. As shown above, after February 1944 while the Germans could inflict significant losses upon occasion, such occasions became rarer as the war moved forward. 

The P-38 Lightning became operationally active on Oct 15, 1943, one day after the Schweinfurt disaster. Seven groups of P-47s had also become operational about the same time,but at that time lacked the Lightning's range. Note this creation of an escort forces was only four months before Big Week occurred. An examination of 8th AF Fighter Command shows that escorts were, in fact, limited in their ability to defend the bombers by the requirement to stick close, in direct contradiction to what was shown in the trailer. A further examination shows widespread historical agreement that German escort fighters  were similarly hobbled during the Battle of Britain by strict instructions to stay close to the bombers.

In the excellent HBO movie, <i>The Tuskegee Airmen</i>, there was reference made to escorts missing rendezvous with bomber groups in the Mediterranean theater, but that is entirely different from the trailer's claim that escorts refused to defend the bomber while running up their scores. 

The inference is clear: the noble, virtuous Red Tails remained dedicated to their mission, while the white pilots hoo-hawed across the sky pursuing personal glory.  The Airmen turn the tide against German interceptors, and -by implication- save the free world. Add to this the claim that Col. Bullard was somehow personally responsible for getting the group assigned to escort missions , and the result is not only inaccurate, but revisionist bilge. Their true history is so magnificent that such melodramatic exaggeration disrespects the memory of the 332nd FG. 
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Mozbackup is da bomb!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2011/05/mozback_is_da_bomb.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2011:/blog//1.294</id>
   
   <published>2011-05-25T08:29:37Z</published>
   <updated>2011-05-25T09:47:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary>For those using Firefox, I would like to point out a truly premier utility: MozBackup. MozBackup will back up all your vital statistics for both Firefox and Thunderbird, and I can now attest to the utility of this ... er,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[For those using Firefox, I would like to point out a truly premier utility: <a href="http://mozbackup.jasnapaka.com/">MozBackup</a>. MozBackup will back up all your vital statistics for both Firefox and Thunderbird, and I can now attest to the utility of this ... er, utility. :)

Just last week, the S.M.A.R.T. routine in my computers' CMOS indicated that my data drive was bad, so I bought an external USB 2.0 drive, and backed everything up. Just for laughs, I also used MozBackup to backup my browser & email settings to the external drive as well.

...Come Monday night, all Hades breaks loose across the Midwest. I'm lucky in that that the power outage in my part of town was during my time at work. Alas, when I got home, I turned on my computer only to get the message <b>NTLDR not found</b>. Urk. Double-urk. Not good at all.

I was fortunate in that I had a spare 80Gb drive, and re-installed Windows XP. The challenges of installing Firefox & Thunderbird on the new drive, then restoring my old settings were daunting, but MozBackup restored Every.Single.Stinking.Thing; passwords and all. Amazing. Really. 

Thunderbird was very nearly as painless, except for most recent email traffic, but that may be because my Roadrunner account hasn't seen much traffic. All local folders (I make a point of dumping everything over six months old to local folders) restored just fine. My gantry.net account seemed to restore just fine, showing everything back to January.

Bottom line: this sucker is officially Da Bomb for backing up your Firefox settings. Bookmarks, passwords, preferences, themes, plugins; <i>everything</i>. Really. I installed Firefox, ran the restore, and <b>BAMB!</b>, I was back. This was one of the most painless restores I've ever seen, and I go back to CP/M days.

If you use Firefox, this utility is a MUST USE. It's just that simple. 
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Atlas shrugged, and pulled a tendon.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2011/04/atlas_shrugged_and_pulled_a_te.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2011:/blog//1.293</id>
   
   <published>2011-04-30T01:52:43Z</published>
   <updated>2011-04-30T02:04:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Vodkapundit watches Poliwood&apos;s take on the new movie Atlas Shrugged, and decides &quot;Maybe I&apos;ll wait for the DVD.&quot; There was one very telling comment about 8:30 in;Righteous indignation &amp; loud declamation belongs on talk shows. It doesn&apos;t belong on...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Arts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[The <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/2011/04/29/maybe-ill-wait-for-the-dvd/">Vodkapundit</a> watches <a href="http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=103&load=5348">Poliwood's</a> take on the new movie Atlas Shrugged, and decides "Maybe I'll wait for the DVD."

There was one very telling comment about 8:30 in;<blockquote>Righteous indignation & loud declamation belongs on talk shows. It doesn't belong on film.</blockquote> If liberal Hollywood film-makers remembered that, we wouldn't have seen such terrible dogs like <em>Lions for Lambs</em>, <em>Rendition</em>, and <em>Redacted</em>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Andrea Mitchell, mistress of the eraser</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2011/02/andrea_mitchell_mistress_of_th.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2011:/blog//1.292</id>
   
   <published>2011-02-10T02:18:10Z</published>
   <updated>2011-02-10T02:23:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Ace has a post up about Andrea Mitchell&apos;s attempt to rewrite history by way of recasting Ronald Reagan as a moderate. While exposing this claim as self-evident hogwash, he has this to say: It&apos;s one thing for a political party...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="History" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/311781.php">Ace</a> has a post up about Andrea Mitchell's attempt to rewrite history by way of recasting Ronald Reagan as a moderate.

While exposing this claim as self-evident hogwash, he has this to say:
<blockquote>It's one thing for a political party to attempt this gambit. What the hell is a supposed journalist doing regurgitating such bullshit?

Or is Andrea Mitchell this stupid that the Obama Mind Trick worked so well?</blockquote>

Um, is that a trick question?
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A bit of an early Christmas</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2010/12/a_bit_of_an_early_christmas.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2010:/blog//1.291</id>
   
   <published>2010-12-04T22:49:30Z</published>
   <updated>2010-12-04T23:03:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>This weekend has unrolled like a badly-written made for TV movie. Not only have people literally from around the world responded to my request for help (thanks again, everyone!), I just got a job. I do not believe this. No,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Personal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[This weekend has unrolled like a badly-written made for TV movie.

Not only have people literally from around the world responded to my request for help (thanks again, everyone!), I just got a job. I do not <i><b>believe</i></b> this. No, really, I expect Jimmy Stewart to knock on the door any minute now.

It was the strangest thing. Like many people, I have a Facebook account, and keep track of folks I don't see in person very often. Just the other day I saw a friend had wryly posted on her wall that she hadn't been able to enjoy her Thanksgiving meal, as she couldn't keep anything down; bit of a virus. So I dropped her a line; a bit of "hope you get better soon" note, and as an afterthought asked her if knew anyone who was hiring. 

I turns out she's a manager at a local restaurant, and told me to call her the next morning. It was a challenge keeping my hopes down, as I had been disappointed before. I made the call, wherein she asked me to drop by and talk to her kitchen manager. Long story short, I got hired today! Yeah, me. :)

So this weekend has been chock full of minor miracles for me. I'm afraid now that the 25th will seem an anti-climax after all this. I did learn two lessons:

-There are some wonderful people out there, and they're willing to help; try not to lose hope.

-God has a sense of humor, and he really likes messing with my head.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Now, I&apos;m thankful.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2010/12/now_im_thankful.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2010:/blog//1.290</id>
   
   <published>2010-12-04T02:52:40Z</published>
   <updated>2010-12-04T03:11:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Anyone who read my last post would understand why I didn&apos;t feel very thankful for anything about a week ago. In fact, it was quite the opposite. I have been astonished by the kindness and generosity directed at me the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Personal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Anyone who read my last post would understand why I didn't feel very thankful for anything about a week ago. In fact, it was quite the opposite.

I have been astonished by the kindness and generosity directed at me the last 24 hours. I even received a contribution from Australia, and one from Canada. You have all been more than generous, and have both my thanks and my gratitude, as I said in my individual replies.

This has been, to me, a bit of a (slightly) early Christmas miracle. Thanks to you wonderful people, I can turn on the water, keep the electric on, and even pay off a month's back rent. I'm still in a hole, but it's much more shallow now. :)

The warmth and sympathy I've encountered last night, and today, well; I don't have the words. Considering the challenge -normally- is to shut me up, that's something.

So thank you, so very, <i><b>very</b></i> much, to everyone who was willing to chip in to help out a stranger in need. Please feel free to stop sending contributions now, as I can stagger on, on my own now.

Even if nothing else happens this  month, you've already given me a wonderful Christmas. Thank you, again, and God bless every one of you.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A bit of a bleg</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2010/12/a_bit_of_a_bleg.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2010:/blog//1.289</id>
   
   <published>2010-12-02T18:01:22Z</published>
   <updated>2010-12-04T22:49:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>UPDATE: I published a new post to the effect that some very generous people have made a great difference, and that I&apos;m no longer in dire straits. I&apos;m in debt &amp; behind on things, but now I can stagger on....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Personal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[UPDATE: I published a new post to the effect that some <em>very</em> generous people have made a great difference, and that I'm no longer in dire straits. I'm in debt & behind on things, but now I can stagger on. Apparently visitors are coming directly to this post, so they don't see the later one.

I want to reiterate that I am deeply grateful to those who responded, but for anyone newly visiting this post, you don't need to send anything. I don't doubt there's someone else around who could also benefit from your great hearts.

Thank you all, and Merry Christmas.

-----
ORIGINAL:
It's never pleasant to admit you're in the hole with no way out. For that matter, it's even less so being there.

That said, my situation is this: out of work, can't find work, water utilities are cut off, and electricity issue on the horizon. Don't even want to talk about rent. 

I'm looking at nearly $200 just to get the water back on, what with penalties and reconnection fees, and nearly the same to keep the electric service on.

If anyone has even a few dollars to drop into the "tip jar" (PayPal button) on my main page (to the left, under the links to Rick Rescorla, and Day by Day), it would be a tremendous help, until I can get back to work.

Better yet, if you can point me to work in the northern Cincinnati/southern Hamilton area, drop me a line.

Thanks, in advance, to those who respond; most especially to John Donovan over at Castle Argghhh!, for the help he has given.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Tear that flag down, Mr. Principal!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2010/11/tear_that_flag_down_mr_princip.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2010:/blog//1.288</id>
   
   <published>2010-11-13T04:23:26Z</published>
   <updated>2010-11-13T04:44:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Cody Alicea is a middle-school student in California who was recently told he wasn&apos;t allowed to bear the American flag on his bike. Apparently &quot;some students had been complaining about the flag.&quot; It turns out that there weren&apos;t just complaints,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="People" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Cody Alicea is a middle-school student in California who was recently told he <a href="http://www.fox40.com/news/headlines/ktxl-americanflagbike11122010,0,3045879.htmlstory">wasn't allowed</a> to bear the American flag on his bike.  Apparently "some students had been complaining about the flag."

It turns out that there weren't just complaints, but some indications that certain other students would become violent; the school referred to possible "uprisings." 

Let me make that clear: some middle school students threatened violence because a boy had an <em>American flag on his bicycle</em>. The multi-culti crowd inmates have taken over the asylum. 
]]>
      <![CDATA[Let's be honest, here; the useful idiots in California have not only engendered multi-culturalism, but a sense of resentment, and of the "other." Instead of "we Americans," they focus on "we black people," "we gay people," or "we Latinos." That last one especially.

The last time we heard about this from California, it was because some latino kids complained about a few boys <a href="http://www.ktvu.com/news/23470391/detail.html">wearing the US flag during Cinco de Mayo.</a> What struck me were the "their flag" and "their holidays" comments. Obviously these children don't consider themselves truly American. The multi-culti crowd has actually managed to severely damage, if not destroy, the melting-pot culture of America.

If I had been asked, I would have told Cody to bear his flag proudly, and then told the entire school that the first student who laid a hand on the boy would be expelled, no questions asked. But I'm a racist bigot, so nobody asked me. I'm the kinda guy who would tell those "us/them" kids to bugger off to Mexico if they didn't like it here. I'd say the same to those <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328703/Two-faces-Armistice-Day-Boy-brimming-pride-fanatics-burning-hate.html">rat-bastiches</a> in England, since they love Afghanistan so much.

It's not a question of celebrating a cultural heritage; Hell, probably more Americans celebrate Cinco de Mayo than do Mexicans. It's a question of separatism, of Us vs. Them. Take Saint Paddy's Day for example; do we hear English-Americans or Scottish-Americans complain about "those Irish?" No. Same thing for Oktoberfest; I come from southwest Ohio, where there's a huge German influence. We love us some beer. This region had some excellent regional breweries before the national brands killed 'em off. I suspect no one complains about the strong Scandinavian roots in Minnesota.

Hell, we treat Canadians like <i>family</i>, with a non-militarized boundary over five thousand miles long. Most people consider things like passports and immigration papers trivial details. 

The real America is a very inclusive place; we're all immigrants. We just want you to leave the Us vs. Them attitude at the door, along with other hatreds, bigotries, and medieval social customs.

Is that so hard to ask?
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>John Murtha, RIP</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2010/02/john_murthat_rip.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2010:/blog//1.287</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-09T05:43:06Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-09T05:48:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary>John Murtha served his time in the Marines. When I read the report of his death, I checked his Wiki entry. Murtha joined the Marines in 1952, and later became a Drill Instructor. He was later selected for OCS. Murtha...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Military" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="People" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[John Murtha served his time in the Marines. When I read the report of his death, I checked his Wiki entry.

Murtha joined the Marines in 1952, and later became a Drill Instructor. He was later selected for OCS. Murtha was discharged in 1955, remaining in the Marine Reserves. He later volunteered for duty in Vietnam, "receiving the Bronze Star with Valor device, two Purple Hearts and the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry." (Wiki)

In other words: no matter what we think of his politics, he was no chickenhawk or Limousine Liberal. The man without a doubt got his hands dirty, and his blood spent. 

That said, in this writer's opinion he sacrificed his moral authority when he slandered the Haditha Marines before the official inquiry was finished. 

In short: while we should honor John Murtha's service, we should also recognize his abdication of loyalty. Hence we should accord former Congressman John Murtha the title of <i><b>EX</b></i>-Marine.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Christmas 2008</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2008/12/christmas_2008.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2008:/blog//1.286</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-25T05:40:06Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-25T05:52:14Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A year ago, I posted the words. Now... Back when I was a wee lad (born 1959) I just couldn&apos;t wait for Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer on the TV. Me&apos;n&apos;Rudy; we were outcasts together! As I grew a (tad), my...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[A year ago, I posted the words. Now...

Back when I was a wee lad (born 1959) I just couldn't wait for <i>Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer</i> on the TV. Me'n'Rudy; we were outcasts together!

As I grew a (tad), my compass tended a touch more "Peanuts-ward," when I finally began to absorb the message repeated by Linus, in <i>A Charlie Brown Christmas</i>.

Last year I reproduced the words, now I'll add the video. :)

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DKk9rv2hUfA&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DKk9rv2hUfA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

 ---
And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.

And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid.

And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.

And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.

And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying,

Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.
 ---

My best wishes and prayers to all, on this most wonderful of days.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Veteran&apos;s Day, 2008</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2008/11/veterans_day_2008.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2008:/blog//1.285</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-11T08:33:34Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-11T17:47:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>This is the day I thank veterans I&apos;ve known, met, heard about, or read their work. So thank you to Baldilocks, John Donovan, Blackfive, CDR Salamander, Neptunus Lex, Greyhawk, and the rest. This includes sidekicks like Uncle Jimbo, Deebo, and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Arts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Military" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="People" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[This is the day I thank veterans I've known, met, heard about, or read their work.

So thank you to <a href="http://baldilocks.typepad.com/baldilocks/">Baldilocks</a>, <a href="http://www.thedonovan.com/">John Donovan</a>, <a href="http://www.blackfive.net/">Blackfive</a>, <a href="http://www.cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/">CDR Salamander</a>, <a href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/">Neptunus Lex</a>, <a href="http://www.mudvillegazette.com/">Greyhawk</a>, and the rest. This includes sidekicks like Uncle Jimbo, Deebo, and company at B5, Dusty'n'Bill over at Castle Argghhh!!, and Mrs. G. at Mudville.

To all of you, to the men and women who have served before, or are serving now; thank you, and God bless you. 

You are the sheepdogs who keep the wolves from the door, 

In salute give you 3 Doors Down, and their magnificent <i>Citizen Soldier</i>. How many rock bands can quote the Soldier's Creed?

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LJRthpxDM10&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LJRthpxDM10&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A not-so-bold Electoral Map prediction</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2008/11/my_notsobold_electoral_map_pre.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2008:/blog//1.284</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-04T17:27:05Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-05T04:46:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Vodkapundit got me started on the EC-wargaming thing. Back on October 13 I did a little twiddling of my own, with the results here....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[The <a href="http://vodkapundit.com/?p=10550">Vodkapundit</a> got me started on the EC-wargaming thing. Back on October 13 I did a little twiddling of my own, with the results <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/?map=1&save=3-3-3-3-1-4-1-1-1-4-4-1-3-1-4-2-3-3-3-1-1-1-2-2-3-4-3-3-4-1-1-2-1-4-4-4-3-1-1-1-3-3-3-3-3-1-4-2-4-2-3">here</a>.

]]>
      The logic behind it is fairly simple; instead of just following the polls, I folded in the recorded actual vote listed for 2000 and 2004, as well as the trend (say, Bush +6.3, Bush +12.9, or Bush +1.4, Kerry + 0.9). Quite a few of the poll results don&apos;t match up well with actual voting patterns.

For example, I tagged New Mexico as &quot;leaning McCain&quot; since the votes were Gore +0.1 (2000), Bush +0.7 (2004). A slight, but reddish lean. Florida went Bush +0.1 (2000) to Bush +5.0 (2004), but I only flagged it as leaning, not solid. Just to be safe. 

Here in Ohio we went Bush both times, but he dropped from +3.5 to +2.1. I suspect a lot of that was due to the terrible GOP Taft administration. On the other hand I doubt that Obama will do well in Ohio after his &quot;bitter clingers&quot; and Joe the plumber remarks. Hillary pretty much cleaned his clock here during the primaries, and would have presented a much stronger challenge to McCain.

And, yes, I have Colorado leaning red, because that state went for Bush, with diminishing results (+8.4, +4.7). Colorado may end up a very tight race, but I doubt they&apos;ll go +5.5 Obama as RCP is predicting. Again, if Hillary were running, it would be a different story.

Stephen has Montana as undecided, when it went +25, +20 for Bush. Indiana is also shown as &quot;undecided,&quot;  but it went for Bush +15.7, +20.7 the last two elections. 

You&apos;ll notice there are no &quot;toss up&quot; states on my map, because this is supposed to be a prediction. At the end of the day, each state will have voted for Obama, or McCain. Period. No &quot;toss up&quot; EC votes will exist. So I removed those from my map and committed them to a candidate, usually only as leaning unless the historical vote indicated otherwise (such as Montana, above).

Feel free to check out the map, but note the recorded votes for each state. Also note that my map gives Obama 204 &quot;solid&quot; votes with only 60 &quot;leaning,&quot; while McCain has only 140 &quot;solid&quot; with 134 &quot;leaning.&quot; Still, I&apos;m fairly confident about a healthy number of those leans.

Doing a little checking, and I see that my map runs very close to the actual 2004 election, except that Obama picks up two states: New Mexico and Iowa.



   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Great fake bands from movies and TV</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2008/10/great_fake_bands_from_movies_a.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2008:/blog//1.283</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-03T03:46:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-03T04:11:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Ace links to a list: &quot;20 Real-Cool Fake Bands from TV and Movies.&quot; The sad thing is that they included some really lame bands, and forgot several excellent ones. First, as Ace points out, Eddie and the Cruisers didn&apos;t even...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Arts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Ace <a href="http://minx.cc/?post=274735" target=_blank_>links</a> to a list: "20 Real-Cool Fake Bands from TV and Movies." The sad thing is that they included some really lame bands, and forgot several excellent ones.

First, as Ace points out, Eddie and the Cruisers didn't even make the list. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!?

Other great movie groups they missed: 
 -Wyld Styllyns (<em>Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure</em>)
 -the Blues Brothers
 -the Monkees (ok, they're TV)
 -The Wonders (<i>That Thing You Do</i>)
 -The Lone Rangers (<i>Airheads</i>)
 -Suburban Funk (<i>The New Guy</i>)
 -James "Thunder" Early and the Dreamettes (<em>Dreamgirls</em>)
 
... and my all-time personal favorite: The Commitments, from the movie of the same name.
 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A little note of gratitude for my friends on the Left...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2008/10/a_little_note_of_gratitude_for.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2008:/blog//1.282</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-03T01:14:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-02T20:46:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Patterico recently had something to say about the Horrible Reporting that the L.A. Times Did on the US Attorneys purge last year. It&apos;s good stuff. What caught my eye was his mention of an earlier argument (March &apos;07) that then-Attorney...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Patterico recently had something to say about the <a href="http://patterico.com/2008/10/01/that-report-on-the-us-attorneys/" target=_blank_>Horrible Reporting that the L.A. Times Did</a> on the US Attorneys purge last year. It's good stuff.

What caught my eye was his mention of an earlier argument (March '07) that then-Attorney General Gonzales should resign, something I would have heartily agreed with had I seen it. 

Patterico then mentioned that he had opposed nominating Gonzales for the Supreme Court back in September of '05, which brings me to this post.

To my friends on the <i>Left</i>, who opposed the Gonzales nomination for the Supreme Court:










<h1 align="center">THANK YOU</h1></big>












]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Back when &quot;progressive&quot; was a good thing</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/2008/10/back_when_progressive_was_a_go.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thegantry.net,2008:/blog//1.281</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-02T19:00:35Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-02T20:14:14Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Neptunus Lex had something to say about the differing reactions that McCain and Obama recently faced, when commenting on a proposal to lift the ROTC ban at Columbia University. The thread quickly became a discussion about &quot;keeping (or encouraging) liberals...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="History" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Neptunus Lex had <a href="http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/10/01/the-courage-of-their-convictions/" target=_blank_>something to say</a> about the differing reactions that McCain and Obama recently faced, when commenting on a proposal to lift the ROTC ban at Columbia University. 

The thread quickly became a discussion about "keeping (or encouraging) liberals out of the military," with the majority opinion developing that political diversity is very important for our military. It's a good thread, you should Read The Whole Thing, as they say.

What caught my eye towards the end was a secondary thread started by <a href="http://redbannernorthernfleet.blogspot.com/" target=_blank_>russiannavyblog</a> (comment #15) wherein he mentioned more than a few liberal military members of excellent standing. Others took issue as to whether certain politicians (Teddy Roosevelt) were "really" liberal or not, and in what context. Mention was made of Teddy's trust-busting work, in contrast to McKinley.

That's where I jumped in: 

Back in the day, more than a few of those trusts were (economically) objectionable. The problem is that both the economic & political context have changed, as well as our terms. 

Back then, "progressive" or "reformist" meant something. Truly large corporations (including especially the railroad companies) held an enormous power over local politics. Unions were still scrabbling for a toehold, up to the point where the Supreme Court struck down one collective bargaining agreement on the basis that said agreement violated the individual's right to freely contract their own labor. Even most conservatives today would, I think, be appalled at that logic. 
]]>
      <![CDATA[There was no such thing as a pure food and drug act, and you would be amazed at the crap they would put into food. The slums in the inner cities were as bad as Nancy Pelosi seems to think they are today.

And black Americans were second-class citizens. Which reminds me, let's all thank the idealistic Woodrow Wilson for introducing Jim Crow to Washington, D.C.

Basically, there was tremendous room for reform and social/political progress. The problem is that, a century later, society has become more tolerant and open-minded, we hold higher expectations with respect to the environment and what we eat, and for the most part our elections are much less corrupt, Chicago notwithstanding. 

Alas, progressives still seem to see the need for yet even <b>more</b> change. They have failed to grasp that we have reached the actuarial point of diminishing returns for more extensive government intervention in society. We've managed to more or less eliminate sexism and racism from our social and corporate structure, and even homosexuals have gained a tremendous degree of freedom unthinkable even thirty years ago.

Progressives see an imperfect society with residual bigotry, while independents such as myself see that it's impossible to mold to 100% perfection.

One may not refuse to hire, or fire someone else based on their race, ethnicity, religion, politics, or even sexual orientation. Any citation of any of the above as a basic for some sort of political disqualification results in protest and abuse; I cite Obama and Romney in evidence.

In other words, all the legal and social barricades are gone. Alas, we still have the barricades inside citizen's minds, and government is worthless for that. Doesn't mean the loyal progressive will stop trying, which I think explains speech and hate-crime legislation. Progressive intentions are good -they trying to eliminate bigotry, racism, etc.- but the methods are questionable. They see such legislation as improving society. I see such legislation has criminalizing thought without any measurable social benefit.

Such impulses really do demonstrate a law of diminishing returns, excuse the pun. But that's why (I believe) many progressives advocate things like hate/crime speech laws, or AA quotas. All real barriers addressable by government power have been overthrown, but they're still determined to build a perfect world, so they're sucked down the rabbit hole of social engineering.

This is not to say there are no issues with modern conservatism, but that isn't the current topic.

In both cases we need to acknowledge how our society works <i>today</i>, and think of <i>new</i> approaches. Get our minds "out of the box," as it were.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

